Chromatic v. The Emotional Mathematics Westminster Cannot Solve

A jurisdictionally sculpted welfare dossier from the SWANK Evidentiary Catalogue, documenting the 48-hour emotional paradox surrounding Prerogative — whose visible distress on 26 November was followed by an unexplained absence from the next day’s contact session.

Based on formal correspondence submitted to CAFCASS, this dossier examines:

• Prerogative’s sudden emotional withdrawal and visible distress
• the Local Authority’s claim that he simply “wants to go out”
• the sharp contradiction between these two days
• the absence of any safeguarding explanation for missed contact
• the need for CAFCASS intervention to log a welfare concern
• Westminster’s ongoing pattern of narrative gaps and interpretive silence

This is not commentary.
This is evidence — preserved in SWANK’s legal-aesthetic structure, documenting the dissonance between institutional statements and observable emotional reality.

Ideal for:
• safeguarding professionals
• legal observers and family-court analysts
• human-rights researchers
• families documenting institutional misconduct
• readers who prefer their evidence elegant and their bureaucracy exposed

A SWANK London Evidentiary Catalogue artefact.
Not edited. Not diluted. Only documented.