Chromatic v. The Local Authority’s Habit of Calling Immunology a Feeling

A clinically and legally precise dossier from the SWANK Evidentiary Catalogue, correcting the Local Authority’s repeated misunderstanding of eosinophilic asthma — a physiological immunological condition that Westminster continues to mislabel as “emotional.”

Based on a formal clarification issued to Children’s Services, this dossier establishes:

• eosinophilic asthma as a biological, not behavioural, illness
• the medical risks of misclassifying airway inflammation as mood
• how lack of routine, stability, and environmental control can trigger respiratory deterioration
• when unmanaged asthma becomes a functional disability under the Equality Act 2010
• why Regal, Prerogative, Kingdom, and Heir require predictable, medically informed care
• the safeguarding failures that arise when public servants replace science with speculation

This is not commentary.
This is medical and legal rectification — rendered in SWANK’s signature evidentiary architecture, dismantling the Local Authority’s respiratory illiteracy with clinical elegance.

Ideal for:
• safeguarding professionals
• disability advocates
• legal practitioners and family-court observers
• medical researchers
• families confronting institutional misunderstanding of chronic illness

A SWANK London Evidentiary Catalogue artefact.
Not edited. Not diluted. Only documented.