Chromatic v Westminster (No. 51): On the Historic Illiteracy of Misreading Asthma as Emotion
A formally archived SWANK Core document correcting Westminster’s long-running misinterpretation of eosinophilic asthma as “emotional presentation.” This record dismantles decades of institutional illiteracy and documents how Regal, Prerogative, Kingdom, and Heir were medically misunderstood, misclassified, and ultimately harmed by professionals who confused respiratory inflammation with behaviour. Filed by Polly Chromatic for the Mirror-Court Evidentiary Catalogue, this entry stands as both evidence and aesthetic discipline.
A Core SWANK evidentiary PDF correcting Westminster’s historic confusion between lungs and emotions. A clinical explanation of eosinophilic asthma misread as behaviour in Regal, Prerogative, Kingdom, and Heir. A polished, judicial-aesthetic record suitable for legal bundles, JR filings, and international complaints. A demonstration of institutional illiteracy preserved for permanent academic and legal scrutiny.