Chromatic v. The Public Servants Who Whisper in Circles but Document Nothing

A sharply framed welfare dossier from the SWANK Evidentiary Catalogue, documenting the sudden emotional deterioration of Prerogative on 26 November and the astonishing explanation offered by Westminster for his disappearance from the following day’s contact session:
“he wants to go out.”

Based on a formal escalation to Westminster Children’s Services, this dossier analyses:

• Prerogative’s abrupt emotional collapse during supervised contact
• withdrawal, visible distress, and reliance on Regal, Kingdom, and Heir
• the Local Authority’s contradictory, non-child-centred narrative
• the disruption of a pre-approved Thanksgiving family contact
• the emotional instability suggested within the placement environment
• the statutory requirement for IRO oversight under s.25B Children Act 1989
• Westminster’s ongoing pattern of procedural silence and narrative inconsistency

This is not commentary.
This is evidence — rendered in SWANK’s legal-aesthetic architecture, preserving the contradiction between institutional statements and observable emotional reality.

Ideal for:
• safeguarding specialists
• legal practitioners and family-court analysts
• human-rights researchers
• international observers of State care
• anyone who values elegant documentation of bureaucratic failure

A SWANK Evidentiary Catalogue artefact.
Not edited. Not diluted. Only documented.